Crazy

I’m not usual one to report “celebrity” sort of news, but in case anyone outside of Britain has missed it, Mohamed al Fayed testified before the inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Yes, I know it has been over ten years since her death, but her cause of death is only now being officially determined by a jury. This is mostly because of Mohamed al Fayed.

He is the father of Diana’s lover du jour, Dodi Fayed.  He has always told the press (over and over) that he is convinced that Diana’s and Dodi’s deaths were the result of a complex plot. Now he has told the inquest jury. The full details are worth reading in a reputable source like The Times. Why do you want to read this? Because it is truly bizarre. Let me just set the stage:

The alleged plot involved Prince Philip, Prince Charles, British, French and American security services, the French judiciary, ambulance staff, pathologists, newspaper editors, two former Metropolitan police commissioners, the Princess’s sister and brother-in-law, the former British ambassador to France, and the Princess’s lawyer, among others, and it was sanctioned by Tony Blair.

It gets more weird. Really.

Backfire

With all of the legislation and regulation New Labour has brought upon us, it is awfully good to see that one of their key legislative achievments is in tatters. With the help of a few well-intentioned members of the Opposition, the Government was able to pass the ban on foxhunting in 2004. It took them several attempts and they finally had to invoke the Parliament Act (for only the fourth time since 1949) which allows a bill to become law despite being voted down in the House of Lords.

So what a joy it is to see that the effect of the ban as been to increase the interest in foxhunting. The number of anti-hunting protesters continues to dwindle. The League Against Cruel Sports has seen its membership decline from 18,000 to between 5,000 and 10,000. Their spokesman wouldn’t be any more specific, according to the Sunday Telegraph. They are having to sell up their offices and find cheaper accommodation. At the same time the number of hunt participants has risen to 68,000.

The anti-hunt campaigners have always been a minority. It is only because the urbanisation of the UK has made a Labour Government, comprised principally of townies, able to trample on the historic rights of the countryside. The hunters have put up the often violent attacks by protesters. (It’s amazing how animal rights people have such little regard for humans.) When the Government trampled on then, they uncharacteristically put up a fight. Most of the time Brits follow sheepishly when the Government tells them what to do.